(Ars Technica letters on NASA’s refusing to require integrated end-to-end testing for the new moon-landing program)
Wickwick wrote: “Forgive me if I’m misunderstanding something, but if you’re testing "across multiple facilities," how can you be doing end-to-end testing?”
whiteknave wrote: “Simple. One end is in one facility, the other end is in another facility.”
mdrejhon wrote: “If you were testing a horse, you would have to saw the horse in half to test the front end and the rear end in distant facilities.
The horse will not function within the same nominal parameters if tested that way.”
Here are some topics of interest, along with a form to add your thoughts (see below). Categories are listed here — click on a category’s “twistor” to see the boards under each, and click on a board’s twistor to see its topics. Click on a topic link to go to that page.
Visitors following old links to the CTS "forum" will be redirected to this Discussions area. The old forum has been closed and removed. If you want a look at a specific product's bug reports, please try its GitHub issues list. Some general discussions are now in this area.
Currently, the ability to post to this area is disabled, due to the huge amount of spam it received, compared to the number of useful posts. At some point in the future, posting may be re-enabled, if we can find a better way to control the spam :-(.
All content © copyright 2005 – 2024
by Catskill Technology Services, LLC.
All rights reserved.
Note that Third Party software (whether Open Source or proprietary) on this
site remains under the copyright and license of its owners.
Catskill Technology Services, LLC does not claim copyright over such software.
This page is https://www.catskilltech.com/Discuss.html
Search Quotations database.
Last updated Wed, 18 Jan 2023 at 8:19 AM